Riots, looters and thieving…

I wasn’t going to jump into this whole debate but i’ve seen a few things over the last couple of days which has changed my mind. Gloucester hasn’t escaped the influence of the riots, with some vandalism and fires started in a couple of places and some clashes with police.

The impact image from the first phase of the riots was the burning of the of the Carpetright building, with people escaping from the flats above.

Since then, i’ve also come across a few other interesting things, including a website which features altered photos of a number of the looters.

Another is YouTube video link to an interview with a local resident of London, who makes some good points about why the riots started.

My personal view is that there was some basis for the initial protest based on the initial fatal shooting of Mark Duggan, in that Mr. Duggan didn’t shoot at police first and was dragged from his vehicle then shot. In an area where there is existing tension between police and residents, this was always going to escalate. The subsequent looting and vandalism is not acceptable.

Some of the basis for why these people feel it is acceptable to go out and vandalise property, loot shops and endanger lives is that the example being set by influential members of our society is so fundamentally flawed. Politicians have been involved in illegal expenses claims for years, banks have been taking wild and irresponsible risks and gambles with our money for years (culminating in a long recession with all it’s associated problems and impacts), the police have been criticised for their handling of the student protestes and various enquires, religious hypocrisy has reared it’s head again in the form of the abuses of children.

So, the Government, police, bankers and religious leaders are not providing the kind of moral guidance which is needed, particularly at a time when the world economy is suffering and unemployment is high. When every job in some of these areas attracts in excess of 50 applicants, it must be very hard to get out of the situation. A recent job vacancy in my organisation attracted over 90 applicants, all with degrees and post-graduate qualifications.

The fact that the looters feel they have nothing to loose in doing what they are doing is a very sad reflection of the situation in some parts of our urban areas. I can’t imagine being in a position where I have nothing to loose. It must be a pretty grim position, especially as they know they are being filmed, photographed and now tracked down.

Having said all of that, all of this is not some kind of justification for what happened, but it is part of why it happened. I can’t condone much of what’s happening and not what’s happening in other urban areas. Compared to the real poverty experienced by the vast majority of the world’s population, people in this country are in a much better position, but it’s easy to say that when i’m not in that position!


St. Oswald’s Priory lighting, take 3…

Following an incident of vandalism to the lighting scheme at St. oswald’s Priory in Gloucester, we’ve finally managed to get much of the scheme up and running again.

One minor setback though was that there was a further incident of vandalism there, where two more of the lights were knocked out! The contractors will now have to come back out again in the nest few months. The thing is that it takes a minimum of 2 months to get the equipment plus the extra time to organise and order. They managed to get the newly replaced lights working so at least it’s almost fully functional for the winter and Christmas period.

We’ve also been organising for protective metal grills to be fitted to the lights and now hopefully these will deter further damage.



Ok, some really bad news for the new lighting scheme at St. Oswald’s Priory in Gloucester:

Article in the Saturday Citizen

I can’t say i’m completely surprised as there had been some minor vandalism months before but this seems like a systematic attack. Also at 4:30pm?? Did they want to get caught.

Very annoying given it’s taken 2 years to get the scheme designed, given the OK by English Heritage and implemented.

Anyway, we’ll have to wait to see what the Magistrates Court says but the £6,000 (or more) cost for replacing the lights may not be forthcoming.